Risk & Testing

Managed Phishing Campaigns

Clear priorities. Practical protection. A partner accountable for the next step.

Measure employee behavior through controlled phishing simulations and targeted follow-up coaching.

Discuss this service All services

Defined scope

Coverage, responsibilities, and exclusions documented first.

Existing stack

Designed around current tools and practical constraints.

Review cycle

Activity, findings, and next actions made understandable.

02 / Service overview

Measure employee behavior through controlled phishing simulations and targeted follow-up coaching.

A managed phishing exercise is a controlled learning activity, not a covert attempt to embarrass employees. Written authorization defines the audience, scenario limits, data captured, reporting route, privacy treatment, escalation contacts, and how anyone who reports the simulation will be handled.

Results are interpreted at the campaign and role level. Message delivery, reporting, link interaction, submitted simulation data, support impact, and repeat behavior can guide coaching and control improvements, but a single click does not prove that a person or organization is secure or insecure.

Expected outcomes

Clear scope and ownership
Improved operational visibility
Practical recommendations and reporting

Core capability

What the scope can include

Campaign design
Audience targeting
Behavior analytics
Remedial training

Final inclusions, tooling dependencies, coverage, and response authority are confirmed during scoping.

03 / Operating fit

When Managed Phishing Campaigns is the practical next step

The strongest fit is a defined operating gap with clear owners, available inputs, and a decision the service is expected to improve.

Training results lack behaviour data

The organization needs a controlled way to understand reporting, credential-entry, and follow-up behaviour across relevant user groups.

High-risk roles need focused practice

Finance, executives, administrators, service desks, or other exposed teams need scenarios matched to the decisions they actually make.

Exercises need safer governance

Campaigns require written approval, privacy boundaries, escalation contacts, and a plan for handling reports without creating unnecessary harm.

04 / Scope design

Make the inputs, outputs, cost drivers, and boundaries visible

These details are confirmed during discovery and written into the proposal so both teams understand what delivery depends on and what remains outside the service.

Prerequisites

Written authorization and approved audiences
Mail-flow and allow-list coordination where required
Privacy, employee-relations, and data-retention decisions
A reporting channel and follow-up education plan

Typical deliverables

Campaign plan and scenario rationale
Aggregate behaviour and reporting analysis
Role-aware coaching recommendations
Repeat-test plan tied to observed gaps

Primary cost drivers

Audience size and segmentation
Scenario complexity and localization
Campaign frequency
Integration and reporting requirements

Important boundaries

Campaigns do not request real passwords or sensitive data
Results are not used as proof that an individual is secure or insecure
Targeting and data handling follow the approved employee policy

Authority and escalation

The sponsor approves targeting, timing, scenario, and data handling
HR, legal, privacy, and employee-relations decisions stay with customer owners
Campaign operators pause activity through the agreed safety and incident path

Review measures

Message delivery and employee reporting by approved audience
Interaction patterns by role or scenario without misleading individual claims
Time to report and quality of internal escalation
Coaching and control actions completed before retesting

05 / Proposal checks

How to evaluate a Managed Phishing Campaigns proposal

A useful proposal should make the operating commitment understandable before signature. Use these checks to compare the written scope with the outcome your team actually needs.

What must be ready before onboarding?

Required inputs: written authorization and approved audiences; mail-flow and allow-list coordination where required; privacy, employee-relations, and data-retention decisions; a reporting channel and follow-up education plan. Assign an owner and readiness check to each dependency.

What evidence should the service produce?

Expected evidence: campaign plan and scenario rationale; aggregate behaviour and reporting analysis; role-aware coaching recommendations; repeat-test plan tied to observed gaps. Name the recipient, review cadence, and decision supported by each output.

Which assumptions can change the price?

Cost assumptions: audience size and segmentation; scenario complexity and localization; campaign frequency; integration and reporting requirements. Separate onboarding, recurring delivery, and approved changes in the proposal.

Where does provider responsibility stop?

Responsibility limits: campaigns do not request real passwords or sensitive data; results are not used as proof that an individual is secure or insecure; targeting and data handling follow the approved employee policy. Assign excluded decisions and adjacent work to a named owner or service.

06 / Delivery

A clear delivery process

A repeatable path from defining the need to operating and improving the service.

01
Authorize the exercise
Confirm sponsor approval, audience, exclusions, privacy rules, scenario constraints, support contacts, data retention, and success questions.
02
Design and test
Build role-relevant messages and landing behavior, coordinate mail flow, test tracking, and verify that no real credentials or sensitive data are requested.
03
Run and safeguard
Release through the approved schedule, monitor reports and operational impact, and stop or escalate the campaign if a defined safety threshold is reached.
04
Teach and retest
Analyze aggregate behavior, deliver targeted guidance, assign control improvements, and plan a repeat exercise around the observed gap.

Questions

What buyers usually ask

The final answer depends on your environment and agreed scope. These are useful starting points.

Will a simulation collect real passwords?

No. The exercise should use a controlled landing experience and capture only the minimum approved simulation events. Real credentials, payment details, and other sensitive data are not requested or retained.

Should individual employees be named in campaign reports?

Reporting and access follow the approved privacy, HR, and employee-relations policy. Aggregate and role-level analysis is usually more useful for identifying process and learning gaps; individual handling requires an explicit authorized purpose.

What should happen after a phishing campaign?

Observed behavior should lead to targeted coaching, clearer reporting routes, mail or identity control improvements, updated procedures, and a planned retest. A completion rate alone is not a sufficient outcome.

Related services